In recent weeks and even months, many members of parliament and high-profile figures in the media have been attacking the 2016 referendum campaign and are calling for a new one to be held. Like any argument, many agree and many disagree, but let’s break down the “evidence” and look into both sides of the debate.
Those calling for a second referendum are mainly saying one of two points:
- That the leave campaign in 2016 was sold to the public under false claims and accusations, for example the £350 million pounds going to the National Health Service. The days after the referendum the picture was changed, much to public annoyance.
- That 3 years after the referendum, the will of the British people has changed. Those on the “peoples vote” campaign argue that after all this uncertainty and endless debate on good deal, bad deal, no deal, the backstop, WTO Rules, the economy, that people have just had enough. The argument is what is the point? and wouldn’t it just be easier to remain?
I understand and kind of agree with point number 1. Many in my family and friendship groups voted Leave in 2016 based on many of the points and opinions made by the Leave Campaign. My family in particular rely on the National Health Service a lot, and the £350 million pound pledge was one of the fundamental reasons for their vote. Some of my family now are moving to the Remain side because of the broken promises and endless uncertainty.
However, I also understand the points of those arguing that we should NOT have a second referendum. And the points are mainly this:
- The United Kingdom constitutionally voted to leave the European Union on the 23rd June 2016. Calling a vote again would be considered a massive betrayal to many, many people. It’s almost symbolising politicians saying “You got it wrong that time, you need to vote again.” and for what? What is the point wasting all this time on a campaign for another referendum when the result is likely to be the same? Wouldn’t it be better instead of wasting that time to put it towards building an efficient and beneficial deal for both the United Kingdom and the European Union.
- If we had a People’s Vote and the result wasn’t liked, what would happen next, a third referendum? I think that it could cause many more problems for this country, and as a result could have a huge impact on out economy.
To conclude, I am still slightly undecided on the position I have my mind set on. I understand the point of some false promises made in the 2016 campaign, however do believe that it could just all be a waste of time.
Well! I hope you have found this blog post interesting, let me know your opinion on my Twitter account and I may feature it within an upcoming blog post!
See You Soon!
